RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


SSA05-06

A Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Visceral Organ versus Spine-targeted Protocols for the Evaluation of Spinal Fracture: Is Additional Spine-targeted CT Necessary to Evaluate Thoracolumbar Spinal Fractures in Blunt Trauma Victims?

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on November 28, 2010
Presented as part of SSA05: Emergency Radiology (Imaging of Trauma)

Participants

Junhyung Lee, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Sungjun Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Min Hee Lee MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jeong Ah Ryu MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Choon Sik Yoon, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yaena Kim MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jihe Lim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Young Han Lee MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jin-Suck Suh MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of spine-targeted CT (TLS-CT) is necessary for the patient who underwent visceral organ targeted CT (AP-CT).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A total of 420 vertebrae in 72 consecutive patients that underwent AP-CT to assess blunt traumatic injury and an additional CT examination using a TLS-CT protocol to evaluate spinal fractures were retrospectively evaluated. The AP-CT set (set A, reconstructed with using a wide display field of view [DFOV] and a soft algorithm) and the TLS-CT set (set S, reconstructed using a narrow DFOV and a hard algorithm) were composed of axial plus reformatted sagittal and/or coronal images. Three radiologists independently reviewed all CT data retrospectively. Performances for detecting and typing fractures were compared by using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and by determining concordance rates.

RESULTS

The overall AUCs for sets S and A for fracture detection were 0.996 and 0.995 respectively; no significant difference was found between the two sets in performance of fracture detection. Concordance rates for typing performance also showed no statistical significance between the two sets for any of the three observers.

CONCLUSION

Sixteen-detector row CT images reconstructed using a soft algorithm and a wide display FOV that cover the entire abdomen using a visceral organ targeted protocol with 1.5 mm collimation are sufficient for the evaluation of spine fractures in trauma patients given that multiplanar-reformatted images are provided. Spine-targeted CT acquisition is not needed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

The elimination of an additional spine-targeted CT protocol would substantially reduce time, the storage burden, and potential patient radiation exposure.

Cite This Abstract

Lee, J, Kim, S, Lee, M, Ryu, J, Yoon, C, Kim, Y, Lim, J, Lee, Y, Suh, J, A Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Visceral Organ versus Spine-targeted Protocols for the Evaluation of Spinal Fracture: Is Additional Spine-targeted CT Necessary to Evaluate Thoracolumbar Spinal Fractures in Blunt Trauma Victims?.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9005526.html