RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


LL-CHS-SU1B

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Blood Clot Burden Quantification with CT Pulmonary Angiographic Imaging

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 28, 2010
Presented as part of LL-CHS-SU: Chest

Participants

Alessandro Furlan MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Amol Patil, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Bum-Woo Park, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Chung-Chou H. Chang, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Mark S. Roberts, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Kyongtae Tyler Bae MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Patent agreement, Covidien AG, Saint Louis, MO Patent agreement, Bayer AG, Pittsburgh, PA Expert Advisory Committee, Bracco Group, Princeton, NJ

PURPOSE

To assess accuracy and reproducibility of clot burden quantification with CT pulmonary angiographic (CTPA) imaging.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board-approved. A semi-automated program was developed for segmentation and volumetric quantification of pulmonary embolus with CTPA. Accuracy of measurement method was assessed using two pulmonary embolus phantoms. Reproducibility of measurement method was assessed using clinical CTPA of 30 patients (16 women, 14 men; mean age, 62 years) with pulmonary embolism (PE). Two observers segmented and measured the volume of blood clot from CTPA images twice at two separate sessions. Accuracy was evaluated by the relative volume measurement error. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); agreement between measurements within and between the two observers was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Mean relative measurement error from the two phantoms was less than 1% for both observers. A total of 60 emboli were measured from the 30 patients. Intra-observer ICC was 0.990 for observer 1 and 0.999 for observer 2; inter-observers ICC was 0.994 for session 1 and 0.989 for session 2. ICC for all four clot measurements was 0.988. Mean volume measurement difference for the intra-observers agreement was 0.9% for observer 1 and 0.3% for observer 2, while that for inter-observers agreement was -5.1% for session 1 and -5.8% for session 2.

CONCLUSION

Blood clot burden can be quantified with a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility from CTPA images using a semi-automated segmentation method.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Blood clot burden quantifiable from CTPA may serve as an important imaging biomarker for assessing the prognosis and treatment response for patients with pulmonary embolism.

Cite This Abstract

Furlan, A, Patil, A, Park, B, Chang, C, Roberts, M, Bae, K, Accuracy and Reproducibility of Blood Clot Burden Quantification with CT Pulmonary Angiographic Imaging.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9004207.html