RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


SSA14-02

Ktrans Kurtosis: A Potential Surrogate for Biological Aggressiveness Suitable for Multi-institutional Musculoskeletal Trials

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on November 28, 2010
Presented as part of SSA14: ISP: Musculoskeletal (Tumors and Soft Tissue)

Participants

Greg O. Cron PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Adnan Mohammad Sheikh MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ian Cameron, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Mark E. Schweitzer MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jing Zhang MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Xiao Guang Cheng MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Joel Werier MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Gina Anna Di Primio MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

On MR there is significant overlap in enhancement between malignant and benign masses. Therefore, specific parameters of contrast pharmacokinetics have been used, most commonly Ktrans, a method to assess blood flow and capillary permeability. Since the data acquisition and analysis methods used to compute Ktrans are usually specific to the site, vendor, and model, we applied a modified Ktrans (using kurtosis) which can be used across institutions.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

86 patients (38 benign masses, 48 malignant tumors) were studied at 1.5T with histologic confirmation of diagnosis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was performed with inversion-prepared spoiled gradient echo imaging with matrix = 288 x 160, sixteen 6-mm-thick slices, TI=21 ms, TR=6.3 ms, TE=1.56 ms, readout flip = 20 degrees, temporal resolution = 20 s, total scan time = 4 minutes. Patient motion was corrected by an automatic sub-pixel registration algorithm. Pre-contrast T1 of the tumors was estimated by referencing their signal to muscle (T1 of muscle assumed to be 1000 ms), and a population AIF was utilized. Ktrans was then calculated pixel-by-pixel for each patient. For each patient, a region of interest was drawn around the tumor for all slices by an experienced MSK radiologist, thereby creating a distribution of Ktrans values for that tumor. The kurtosis of each distribution was calculated. Kurtosis values for benign vs malignant tumors were compared using a two-tailed student t-test with unequal variances.

RESULTS

Benign tumors included 17 giant cell tumors, 4 chondroblastomas, 3 desmoid tumors, 3 neurilemmomas, and 6 other. Malignant tumors included 12 metastases, 11 osteosarcomas, 8 chondrosarcomas, and 4 Ewing’s family tumors, and 9 other. The kurtosis values of malignant tumors were higher than those of the benign tumors (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

We have successfully applied Ktrans kurtosis, a method which can be applied across imaging platforms, as a mesaure of biological aggressiveness (surrogate for blood flow / capillary perbeability), showing that this variable is greater in malignant musculoskeletal tumors. This now validates this technique to be used for multi-institution studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Ktrans kurtosis shows potential for distinguishing malignant from benign musculoskeletal tumors and can be used for multi-institution studies.

Cite This Abstract

Cron, G, Sheikh, A, Cameron, I, Schweitzer, M, Zhang, J, Cheng, X, Werier, J, Di Primio, G, Ktrans Kurtosis: A Potential Surrogate for Biological Aggressiveness Suitable for Multi-institutional Musculoskeletal Trials.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9001719.html