RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


SSC05-08

MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pregnant Patient with Acute Abdominal Pain

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2009
Presented as part of SSC05: Emergency Radiology (Nontraumatic Abdominal Emergencies)

Participants

Gabriele Masselli MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Emanuele Casciani, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Elisabetta Polettini MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Luca Bertini MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Gian Franco Gualdi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of pelvic conditions during pregnancy can be challenging. Aim was to assess the per-formance of MR imaging in the evaluation and triage of pregnant patients presenting with acute pelvic pain.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

89 pregnant patients who underwent to MR examination because of acute pelvic pain were included in this prospective study. A US examination was performed in all patients before MR. Multiplanar HASTE, TRUE FISP and GRE MR images were obtained on 1.5 T Siemens Avanto Scanner. In 71/89 (79%) of studies, gadolinium was not administered. The prospective clinical MR interpretations were compared with follow-up and surgical records to determine the correctness of the interpretation.   

RESULTS

MR examinations demonstrated abnormalities in 34 patients: adnexal lesions (n = 3), ovarian torsion (n=1), urinary pathology (n = 5), degenerating fibroid (n = 3), placenta abruption (n=7), DVT (n = 2), hernia (n = 1), colitis (n = 1), thick terminal ileum (n = 1), rectus hematoma (n = 1), appendiceal abscess (n=1), appendicitis (n=2), intraabdominal and rectus muscle abscess (n=1), intussusception (n=1), ulcerative colitis (n=1), Crohn's disease with diffuse peritoneal inflammation (n=3). 19 patients underwent to surgery or interventional therapy and 15 to follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values (ppv), and negative predictive values (npv) of MR imaging were 90.0% vs. 88.9%, 98.1% vs. 95.0%, 97.5% vs. 94.1%, 81.8% vs. 76.2%, 99.1% vs. 97.9%, respectively.  

CONCLUSION

The intrinsic safety of MRI and its ability to accurately show pelvic disease in pregnant patients make it highly useful in the evaluation of these patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

MR can be useful in triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal pain.  

Cite This Abstract

Masselli, G, Casciani, E, Polettini, E, Bertini, L, Gualdi, G, MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pregnant Patient with Acute Abdominal Pain.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8016668.html