RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


LL-MK2049-B08

Quantitative T2 Mapping of Knee Cartilage at Different Time Points: Initial Results about the Differentiation of Healthy Control Cartilage and Cartilage Repair Tissue in the Knee Using Unloading

Scientific Posters

Presented on November 29, 2009
Presented as part of LL-MK-B: Musculoskeletal

Participants

Tallal Charles Mamisch MD, Presenter: Research Consultant, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany
Siegfried Trattnig MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sebastian Quirbach, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Stefan Marlovits MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Goetz Hannes Welsch MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Unloading during an MR examination might change the biochemical parameters related to tissue anisotropy and hydration, such as quantitative T2. The aim of this study was to use cartilage T2 mapping for the assessment of changes related to unloading during a clinical MR examination in the post-operative follow-up of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the knee joint.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Ethical approval for this study was provided by the local ethics commission and written, informed consent was obtained. Thirty patients (35.4±10.5 years) with a post-operative follow-up period of 29.1±24.4 months after MACT were enrolled. A multi-echo, spin-echo T2 sequence was performed at the beginning (’early-unloading’) and at the end (’late-unloading’) of the MR examination,with a time gap of 45 minutes. Mean and zonal region-of-interest evaluations were performed for control cartilage and cartilage repair tissue. Statistical analysis-of-variance was performed.

RESULTS

The change in T2 values (ms) of control cartilage (‘early-unloading’: 50.2±8.4 to ‘late-unloading’: 51.3±8.5) was less pronounced compared to cartilage repair tissue (‘early-unloading’: 51.8±11.7 to ‘late-unloading’: 56.1±14.4) (p=0.024). The difference between control cartilage and cartilage repair tissue was not significant for ‘early-unloading’ (p=0.314); however significant for ‘lateunloading’ (p=0.036). Zonal T2 evaluation revealed a higher dependency on unloading of the superficial cartilage layer.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that T2 relaxation can be used to assess ’early-unloading’ and ’lateunloading’ values of articular cartilage in a clinical setting, and that the time-point of the quantitative T2 measurement might help to differentiate between healthy and affected articular cartilage.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Due to inhomogeneous changes in T2 as a result of unloading, differences between cartilage repair and surrounding control cartilage are dependent on the time point of the measurement.

Cite This Abstract

Mamisch, T, Trattnig, S, Quirbach, S, Marlovits, S, Welsch, G, Quantitative T2 Mapping of Knee Cartilage at Different Time Points: Initial Results about the Differentiation of Healthy Control Cartilage and Cartilage Repair Tissue in the Knee Using Unloading.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8015876.html