Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009
SSE04-06
Head-to-Head Comparison of Left Ventricular Function Assessment with 64-Row Computed Tomography, Biplane Cineventriculography, and 2D and 3D Transthoracic Echocardiography: A Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Gold Standard
Scientific Papers
Presented on November 30, 2009
Presented as part of SSE04: Cardiac (Quantitative Left Ventricular Function)
Johannes Greupner, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Elke Zimmermann MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Andrea Grohmann, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hans-Peter Dübel MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Bernd K. Hamm MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research Consultant, Bayer AG
Research Consultant, Toshiba Corporation
Stockholder, Siemens AG
Stockholder, General Electric Company
Stockholder, Biomed
Research grant, Toshiba Corporation
Research grant, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Research grant, Siemens AG
Research grant, General Electric Company
Research grant, Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd
Research grant, Bayer AG
Research grant, Guerbet AG
Research grant, Bracco Group
Research grant, B. Braun
Research grant, Knauth
Research grant, Boston Group
Equipment support, Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd
Investigator, Copenhagen Malmo Contrast AB, Lund, Sweden
Marc Dewey MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research grant, General Electric Company
Research grant, Bracco ALTANA Pharma GmbH
Research grant, Guerbet SA
Research grant, Toshiba Corporation
Speakers Bureau, Toshiba Corporation
Speakers Bureau, Bayer AG
Author, Springer Science+Business Media Deutschland GmbH
To intraindividually compare left ventricular function assessed with multislice computed tomography using 64 simultaneous detector rows (MSCT), biplane cineventriculography (CVG), and both 2D and 3D transthoracic echocardiography (2D and 3D Echo) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard as an ancillary single-center study of the multicenter trial “CorE-64”.
A total of 35 patients prospectively underwent MSCT (Aquilion 64, Toshiba Medical Systems, Nasu, Japan), CVG, and MRI, and 2D as well as 3D Echo. All five exams were performed within 24h for each patient. Institutional review board approval for this prospective, cardiac function, ancillary study of a multicenter trial on coronary imaging was obtained.
Regarding the ejection fraction, the agreement was significantly superior for MSCT (±13.6%) than for CVG (±19.8%; P=0.03; F-test) and both 2D Echo (±19.6%; P=0.04; F-test) as well as 3D Echo (±21.6%; P=0.01; F-test). MSCT (57.0 ± 14.9%, P=0.63, t-test), 2D Echo (56.3 ± 14.8%, P=0.88, t-test) and 3D Echo (58.8 ± 16.6%, P=0.26, t-test) did not significantly under- or overestimate ejection fraction in comparison to MRI (56.3 ± 16.2%), whereas CVG (61.1 ± 13.9%, P=0.01, t-test) significantly overestimated ejection fraction. For the stroke volumes, the limits of agreement for CVG (±56.6 ml, P=0.001) and 2D and 3D Echo (±46.0 ml and ±50.1 ml respectively, both P<0.05) were also significantly larger in comparison to MRI than for MSCT (±31.5 ml). In comparison to the reference standard MRI, CVG but not MSCT significantly overestimated the end-diastolic volume (P<0.001). In contrast, both 2D and 3D Echo significantly underestimated the end-diastolic volume (both: P<0.05) in comparison to the reference standard MRI.
64-row computed tomography offers a precise and accurate evaluation of global left ventricular function. Furthermore it appears to be more accurate than CVG, 2D and 3D Echo in comparison to MRI as the reference standard.
Using the same data sets acquired for non-invasive coronary angiography 64-row CT allows reliable evaluation of global left ventricular function in clinical practice.
Greupner, J,
Zimmermann, E,
Grohmann, A,
Dübel, H,
Hamm, B,
Dewey, M,
Head-to-Head Comparison of Left Ventricular Function Assessment with 64-Row Computed Tomography, Biplane Cineventriculography, and 2D and 3D Transthoracic Echocardiography: A Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Gold Standard. Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL.
http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8014546.html