RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


SSA05-08

Accurate Estimation of Perinephric Hematoma Volume from Unidimensional Diameters

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 29, 2009
Presented as part of SSA05: Emergency Radiology (Thoracoabdominal Trauma)

Participants

Pedram Rezai MD, Presenter: Grant, Siemens AG
Sandra M. Tochetto MD, Abstract Co-Author: Grant, Siemens AG
Vahid Yaghmai MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Accurate radiologic characterization of perinephric hematoma plays a central role in the clinical evaluation and therapeutic decision making. The purpose of this study was to evaluate imaging unidimensional biomarkers of perinephric hematoma and assess their relationship with hematoma volume.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This retrospective, HIPPA compliant study was approved by IRB. 18 patients (13 males, 5 females; median age, 51.5 years) with perinephric hematoma who underwent contrast enhanced abdominal MDCT were evaluated. Ipsilateral kidney and combined ipsilateral kidney/hematoma were segmented separately and hematoma volume was calculated by subtracting the two volumes. Due to complex configuration, reliable determination of the longest diameters of the hematoma per se was not possible. Instead, the following unidimensional diameters of the combined ipsilateral kidney/hematoma were measured: longest trans-axial diameter (Width; W), longest perpendicular diameter to width on the same slice (Thickness; T) and cranio-caudal dimension (Length; L). Pearson correlation, regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot and Lin’s concordance correlation were used for statistical analysis. p<0.05 denotes statistical significant.

RESULTS

Hematoma volume ranged from 87.85 mL to 2431.30 mL. Mean hematoma volume was 587.07 mL (95%CI, 263.40-910.71). Pearson correlation coefficient between hematoma volume and width (cm), thickness (cm), length (cm) and product of W, L and T (WxTxL) was 0.87, 0.82, 0.95 and 0.99, respectively (p<0.05 in all instances). Regression analysis was used to define the relationship between hematoma volume and (WxTxL): Estimated hematoma volume (EHV) (mL) =0.48 (WxTxL) – 236 (R2=0.98, p<0.05). EHV ranged from 38.7 mL to 2271.37 mL. Mean EHV was 588.53 mL (95%CI, 268.23-908.82). Based on the Bland-Altman plot, mean bias between hematoma volume and EHV was 9.61% (95%CI, -8.09% to 27.31%). Lin’s concordance correlation between hematoma volume and EHV was 0.99 which denotes excellent agreement.

CONCLUSION

Perinephric hematoma volume may be accurately estimated from unidimensional diameters of the combined ipsilateral kidney/hematoma.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

By using this simple, applicable method, hematoma volume may be estimated from unidimensional diameters with high accuracy. 

Cite This Abstract

Rezai, P, Tochetto, S, Yaghmai, V, Accurate Estimation of Perinephric Hematoma Volume from Unidimensional Diameters.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8012268.html