RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


SSE04-01

Four Dimensional Guide-Point Modeling Analyses (ARGUS 4D) of Left Ventricular Volumes and Function in Patients with Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities: Is it valid?

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2009
Presented as part of SSE04: Cardiac (Quantitative Left Ventricular Function)

Participants

Kai Nassenstein, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Holger Eberle, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Christoph Jensen, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Oliver Bruder, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Thomas W. Schlosser MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

4D Guide-Point Modeling (ARGUS 4D, Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany) relies on a mathematic model of the left ventricle (LV) that is fitted to a relatively small number of guide points provided by the user. Since no tracing of the endo- and epicardial borders is necessary, this approach reduces the post-processing time necessary to calculate the LV volumes. Our study aimed to validate ARGUS 4D in patients with regional wall motion abnormalities.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

26 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (18 male, mean age 60±13 years) were examined on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner (Avanto, Siemens, Germany). Contiguous short-axes cine steady state free precession images (TR 3ms, TE 1.5 ms, FA 60°, slice thickness l 5mm) covering the entire LV were acquired, and analyzed by the standard disc summation method (ARGUS) to assess LV volumes. Additionally, two long axis and four short axis cine SSFP images were acquired in a single breath-hold using a TPAT accelerated SSFP sequence (TE 1.12 ms, TR 45.73 ms, FA 78°), and the resulting cine images were used for 4D Guide-Point modeling analysis of the LV volumes.

RESULTS

Results of 4D Guide-Point Modeling analysis were not statistically significantly different to manual tracing for the assessment of end-diastolic (end-diastolic volume: 179.1 ± 57.0 ml vs. 186.0 ± 54.4 ml ; end-systolic volume: 100.5 ± 51.1 ml vs. 103.9 ± 48.6 ml; ejection-fraction: 45.8 ± 12.2 % vs. 45.8 ± 11.9 %, LV muscle-mass: 182.0 ± 72.2 g vs. 170.1 ± 32.7 g; p>0.05 for all variables). 4D Guide-Point Modeling analysis was significantly faster as compared to the standard procedure, saving 142.1 ± 121.4 seconds (p <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite wall motion abnormalities, 4D Guide-Point Modeling yields results for LV volumes that are in excellent accordance with standard LVF analysis results in these patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

4D Guide-Point Modeling allows fast assessment of LV volumes even in patients with regional wall motion abnormalities.

Cite This Abstract

Nassenstein, K, Eberle, H, Jensen, C, Bruder, O, Schlosser, T, Four Dimensional Guide-Point Modeling Analyses (ARGUS 4D) of Left Ventricular Volumes and Function in Patients with Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities: Is it valid?.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8004323.html