RSNA 2008 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2008


LL-GU2239-R04

MRI of Localized Prostate Cancer: Are Endorectal Coils Necessary?

Scientific Posters

Presented on December 4, 2008
Presented as part of LL-GU-R: Genitourinary

Participants

Beatriz Zudaire MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Maria Lourdes Diaz MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Anibal Rincon, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Carmen Blanca Hernandez-Sastre, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alberto Benito MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Juan Javier Zudaire, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the need for endorectal coil in the staging of prostate cancer

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Retrospective study between September 2000 and February 2004 of 179 patients diagnosed of T1-2 stage prostate cancer (TNM 2002) treated with radical prostatectomy who underwent prostate MRI prior surgery. MRI was performed with 1,5T equipment (Symphony, Siemens Erlangen, Germany). Endorectal coil as well as surface coil were employed in 77 patients (43%). In 102 patients (57%) MRI was performed only with a pelvic surface coil. On MRI extracapsular involvement, fat infiltration, seminal vesicle involvement, asymmetric thickening of the neurovascular bundle and the presence of adenopathies were evaluated and compared with histopathological findings. Sensibility (S), specificity (E), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated.  

RESULTS

Extracapsular involvement detection: Endorectal coil: S 50%, E: 91,5%, PPV:64,3%; NPV:85,7% Pelvic surface coil: S:51,6%; E:88,7%;PPV:66,7%; NPV: 80,8% Seminal vesicle involvement: Endorectal coil: S:37,5%; E:91,3%;PPV:33,3%; NPV: 92,6% Pelvic surface coil: S:50%; E:95,7%;PPV:55,6%; NPV: 94,6% Correct staging: Endorectal coil: S:60%; E:84,2%;PPV:57%; NPV: 85,7% Pelvic surface coil: S:57,5%; E:89,9%;PPV:73%; NPV: 81,6%

CONCLUSION

Better specificities were found with the pelvic surface coil however, lower sensibilities were found in this group. With regards to extracapsular tissues pelvic surface coil increases sensibility but reduces specificity. For seminal vesicle involvement, pelvic surface coil improves all parameters.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

The use of pelvic surface coils has a similar value as the use of endorectal coil MRI for the staging of prostate cancer.

Cite This Abstract

Zudaire, B, Diaz, M, Rincon, A, Hernandez-Sastre, C, Benito, A, Zudaire, J, MRI of Localized Prostate Cancer: Are Endorectal Coils Necessary?.  Radiological Society of North America 2008 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, February 18 - February 20, 2008 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2008/6021955.html