RSNA 2008 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2008


SST07-06

Virtual Colonoscopy: Development and Validation of a New Patient Questionnaire for Assessment of Experience and Compliance for Bowel Preparation

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 5, 2008
Presented as part of SST07: Gastrointestinal (CT of Colon: Miscellaneous)

Participants

Peter Neal Wylie MBBChir, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Parthasarathi Das MBBS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ros Ahmad, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Michele Marshall MBBS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
David Nigel Burling MBChB, Abstract Co-Author: Consultant, Medicsight, Inc Grant, E-Z-EM, Inc Grant, Bracco Group

PURPOSE

Superior patient experience related to reduced laxative regimens is frequently cited as a major benefit of virtual colonoscopy (VC) but most questionnaires used for such assessments are not valid or were designed for endoscopy. We aimed to validate a new questionnaire for VC.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A 34 item questionnaire was created using expert opinion (including 2 VC researchers with relevant questionnaire-based publications), literature review and patient interview. 25 consecutive patients undergoing VC in routine practice (21 (84%) had sodium picosulphate/4 had senna 26 g and 100 mls gastrografin) were interviewed before their examination ‘face-to-face’ using the questionnaire. A series of open and closed questions related to ethnicity/understanding/convenience/tolerability/discomfort/anxiety/ compliance were asked. Responses were evaluated for content validity (frequency of similar responses) and following statistical advice, reliability was assessed by Spearman’s correlation (inter-item correlation) and Cronbach's alpha (test of overall questionnaire reliability/consistency).

RESULTS

25 patients (13 (52%) female; median age 70 years) undergoing VC completed the questionnaires. 22 patients (88%) were either very satisfied (32%) or fairly satisfied (56%) with the bowel preparation. 27 questions were deemed valid in content and frequency of endorsement. There was good inter-item correlation (Spearman’s p=-0.395–0.795) with a high level of reliability (Cronbach’s alpha=0.904) overall.

CONCLUSION

This questionnaire, developed for comparing VC bowel preparation regimens, is both valid and reliable.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

This project has delivered a validated patient questionnaire designed for assessment of patient experience of bowel preparation specifically tailored towards virtual colonoscopy.

Cite This Abstract

Wylie, P, Das, P, Ahmad, R, Marshall, M, Burling, D, Virtual Colonoscopy: Development and Validation of a New Patient Questionnaire for Assessment of Experience and Compliance for Bowel Preparation.  Radiological Society of North America 2008 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, February 18 - February 20, 2008 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2008/6018275.html