RSNA 2008 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2008


SSE02-02

Arbitration Cancers in a Population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program Performing Independent Double Reading with Consensus

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2008
Presented as part of SSE02: Breast Imaging (Mammography)

Participants

Solveig Sand-Hanssen Hofvind, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Berta M. Geller, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Per Skaane MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To compare the proportions and radiological features of arbitration and concordant cancers diagnosed in a population based breast cancer screening program with routine independent double reading using consensus.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

In 1,033,872 independently double read screening mammograms 5,611 breast cancers were detected. A 5-point interpretation scale indicating increased probability of cancer similar to BI-RADS describes the initial assessmnet. Mammograms with a score of 1 by one of the radiologists (discordant) and 2 or higher by both radiologists (concordant) are discussed at consensus, where the final decision to recall or not is made. Breast cancer cases diagnosed as a result of the discordant score are defined as arbitration cancers.

RESULTS

Twenty-four percent (1,311/5,611) of the screen detected cancers were arbitration cancers; 10% (549/5,611) had a negative interpretation by Reader 1 while 14% (782/5,611) had a negative score by Reader 2. Positive predictive values were 8% (1,331/17,488) for discordant recalls and 23% (4,280/18,575) for concordant recalls (p<0.00q). Mammographic features did not differ between arbitration and concordant cancers except for calcification without associated masses, which was 24% significantly more common (290/1,229) in arbitration compared to concordant cancers (17%, 677/3,959, p<0.001)

CONCLUSION

Screening mammography using independent double reading with consensus detected at least 10% more cancers than if the first reader was the only reader. We cannot discern from this study wether the cases were missed due to perception or interpretation error.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

This study add knowledge to the issue of cancer detection in screening mammography

Cite This Abstract

Hofvind, S, Geller, B, Skaane, P, Arbitration Cancers in a Population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program Performing Independent Double Reading with Consensus.  Radiological Society of North America 2008 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, February 18 - February 20, 2008 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2008/6015590.html