RSNA 2008 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2008


SSE25-04

Does Practice Make Perfect? The Effect of Repetition on a Vascular Simulator on Radiology Trainees’ Interventional Skills

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2008
Presented as part of SSE25: Vascular/Interventional (The Science of Intervention: New Developments and Technologies)

Participants

Darren Klass MBChB, MRCS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Matthew Tam MA, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Stuart Williams MBCHB, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
John Francis Cockburn MBBCh, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Andoni Paul Toms MBBS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe the changes in radiology trainee performance indicators after performing repeated procedures on a vascular interventional simulator.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 12 first year radiology trainees with no previous interventional experience. Each trainee was taught to perform a selective left renal artery catheterisation, on the vascular simulator (VIST™), using a standardised pre-defined technique. Over a 6 month period the trainees repeated the procedure several times. The recorded measurable endpoint included total procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and pre-defined errors.

RESULTS

12 trainees performed a total of 52 procedures (median 4, range 3-5). Two-tailed paired Student’s t-test was used to compare performance indicators from one repetition to the next. Mean procedure time of the first run was 16.6 minutes. The second run was 13.4 minutes (difference 3.2 minutes, P=0.005), the third run was 11.5 minutes (P=0.002), the fourth run was 12.4 minutes (P= 0.039) and the fifth run 9.8 minutes (P=0.010). Fluoroscopy times decreased from 10.7 minutes for the first run to 6.5 minutes for the fifth run (P=0.12). The mean number of errors per procedure varied from 1 to 3 (range 0-10) but there was no significant trend with increasing number of repetitions. Common mistakes included: inappropriate equipment selection and omitting steps in the procedure

CONCLUSION

Radiology trainees’ performance, measured by total procedure and fluoroscopy times, improves significantly with repeated use of a vascular interventional simulator. However this is not accompanied by an improvement in error rates.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Repeated use of a vascular simulator improves radiology trainees' performance and may be a useful adjunct in interventional radiology training.

Cite This Abstract

Klass, D, Tam, M, Williams, S, Cockburn, J, Toms, A, Does Practice Make Perfect? The Effect of Repetition on a Vascular Simulator on Radiology Trainees’ Interventional Skills.  Radiological Society of North America 2008 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, February 18 - February 20, 2008 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2008/6007351.html