RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSM01-06

The Role of FDG–PET and Ultrasonography in Detection of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Patients

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 28, 2007
Presented as part of SSM01: Breast Imaging (CT and PET)

Participants

Jhii-Hyun Ahn, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Eun Ju Son MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Eun-Kyung Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jin Young Kwak MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Joon Jung MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Young Hoon Ryu MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ki Keun Oh MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to elucidate the usefulness of the FDG–PET and ultrasonography to detect the axilla lymph node involvement in breast cancer.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

From January 2005 to December 2006, total 273 consecutive patients with breast cancer were taken FDG–PET and breast ultrasonography before surgery. If the FDG–PET showed focal hot uptake in ipsilateral axilla, it was diagnosed as positive for lymph node metastasis. In ultrasonography, loss of hilum or eccentric cortical thickening over 2mm were considered as positive. Each imaging findings were compared with pathologic report that the presence of axillary lymph node metastasis, the number of metastatic lymph nodes, and the size of breast mass.

RESULTS

176 patients were invasive ductal carcinoma, 38 were ductal carcinoma in situ, and 59 were others (invasive cribriform carcinoma, invasive apocrine carcinoma, infiltrating lobular carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma). Pathologically confirmed axillary lymph node metastasis were 66 (24.2%). 61 patients (22.3%) had revealed focal uptake in axilla on FDG–PET, and 196 patients (71.8%) suggested axillary lymph node metastasis on US. The size of main mass was 2.12±1.15cm, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes in pathology was 4.9±6.80. In the detection of lymph node metastasis, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FDG–PET was 56.1%, 88.4%, 60.7%, 86.3% and those of US was 86.4%, 32.9%, 29.1%, 88.3%, respectively. The number of metastatic lymph nodes on pathology were related with the positivity of FDG–PET (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The FDG–PET was highly specific for diagnose the lymph node metastasis in breast cancer, but showed high false negative. On the other hand, the US revealed high sensitivity, but showed relatively high false positive rate. The FGD–PET and US may have complementary role in evaluation of lymph node metastasis on breast cancer patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

The FGD–PET and US may have complementary role in evaluation of lymph node metastasis on breast cancer patients.

Cite This Abstract

Ahn, J, Son, E, Kim, E, Kwak, J, Jung, J, Ryu, Y, Oh, K, et al, , et al, , The Role of FDG–PET and Ultrasonography in Detection of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Patients.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5014300.html