RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSM07-02

MR in the Evaluation of Placenta Accreta: Correlation with Doppler US

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 28, 2007
Presented as part of SSM07: Genitourinary (Lower Tract)

Participants

Gabriele Masselli MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Emanuele Casciani, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Elisabetta Polettini, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Roberto Brunelli, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Maurizio Anceschi, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Gianfranco Gualdi, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To determine the value of transabdominal ultrasound (US), transvaginal US, color Doppler US, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Fifty patients in the third trimester of pregnancy who were at risk for placenta accreta underwent color-power Doppler US and MR imaging. Images were interpreted prospectively for signs of accreta by two reviewers. The reviewers' confidence in their diagnosis was graded on a five-point scale.Placental invasion was classified in depth levels and topographic areas in relation to the posterior vesical wall. The final degree of invasion was established during surgery according to clinical and anatomical criteria.

RESULTS

Outcomes at delivery were as follows: normal placenta (n = 31), placenta accreta (n = 12), placenta increta (n=4) and placenta percreta (n=3). Five cases of lower-uterine-segment placenta accreta were diagnosed with a high level of confidence with vaginal and color Doppler US. Ultrasound and Color Doppler showed a sensitivity 77% and specificity 93%, while magnetic resonance imaging showed a sensitivity 91% and specificity 98%. In the three cases of placenta percreta, the placenta demonstrated transmural extension through the uterus and invasion of the bladder wall on MRI, which was not depicted at US. In two patients with a posterior placenta who had previously undergone myomectomy, MR imaging enabled the diagnosis of placenta accreta, which was not depicted at US. In all cases MRI provided topographic information of placental invasion, and in 5 patients, it modified invasion levels.

CONCLUSION

MRI is useful for identifying the presence and extent of placenta accreta/percreta. MR imaging is superior compared with US and color Doppler US in the depiction of posterior placenta accreta and in the evaluation of invasion of bladder wall. Magnetic resonance imaging turned out to be essential to define the topography and area of placental invasion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Magnetic resonance imaging turned out to be essential to define the topography and area of placental invasion. MR can allow a reduction in morbidity and a conservative surgery.

Cite This Abstract

Masselli, G, Casciani, E, Polettini, E, Brunelli, R, Anceschi, M, Gualdi, G, MR in the Evaluation of Placenta Accreta: Correlation with Doppler US.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5012827.html