RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSC15-04

Imaging of PE in the Pregnant Patient: Is V/Q More Robust than CT?

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 26, 2007
Presented as part of SSC15: ISP: Chest (Pulmonary Embolism: Pregnancy, Dose Issues, and CAD)

Participants

Sanjeev Bhalla MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Christine O. Menias MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alison Cahill MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

V/Q provides a lower maternal radiation dose for embolic imaging and does not require iodinated contrast which can cross the placenta, yet many fear that a majority will be nondiagnostic. Our purpose was to determine the performance characteristics of V/Q scans versus multidetector CT in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the pregnant patient.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

After IRB approval, the Radiology information system was searched for all pregnant patients in whom either a V/Q or helical CT for pulmonary embolism was performed (from 2000-2007). All reports were reviewed by a thoracic radiologist, who also reviewed the studies to verify the initial interpretation. Presenting chest radiographs were also reviewed. Clinical followup was also performed.

RESULTS

166 patients were identified: 142 V/Q scans and 35 PE protocol MDCTs. 9 patients had both V/Q scans and CT examinations. In the V/Q group 60 studies (42%) were normal, 68 (48%)were low-likelihood, 9 (6%)were intermediate and 5 (4%)were high-likelihood. Of the 9 intermediate studies, 8 went on to CT of which only 1 was positive. Of these 9 intermediate studies, 5 had initial abnormal chest radiographs. In the CT group, 4 were read as positive (only 2 were positive in review), and 31 were negative (33 in review). In the negative group, 10 (29%)had other explanations for the clinical symptoms of shortness of breath (edema, pneumonia)and 11 (31%)had caveats to the interpretation (limited [2]; moderately limited [9]).

CONCLUSION

In pregnant patients, a minority of V/Q scans will be intermediate whereby a significant number of CTs will be limited. This is likely funstion of the altered hemodynamics in the setting of normal perfusion and ventilation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

The V/Q scan is diagnostic in many pregnant patients. The chest radiograph can be used as a triage tool in embolism imaging: normal radiographs should prompt V/Q while abnormal ones should lead to CT.

Cite This Abstract

Bhalla, S, Menias, C, Cahill, A, Imaging of PE in the Pregnant Patient: Is V/Q More Robust than CT?.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5011381.html