RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSA01-07

Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Work-up of Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma: Prospective and Retrospective Study of 57 Cases—Comparison with Physical Examination, Conventional Imaging, and Histology

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 25, 2007
Presented as part of SSA01: Breast Imaging (MR Imaging)

Participants

Thomas Caramella MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Claire Chapellier, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Francette Ettore, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Inès Raoust, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Emmanuel Chamorey, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Maestro Catherine MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Determination of the value of MRI for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), a diagnostic challenge for the radiologist.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

57 patients with histologically-proven ILC were studied between 1998 and 2006. All patients underwent physical examination, mammography, ultrasound and an MRI. All anomalies detected were graded using the BI-RADS classification and careful research was made for the presence of multifocal/multicentric disease. The histologic tumor size was compared with the other techniques.

RESULTS

66% of the tumors were palpable. The majority of the mammograms presented architectural distorsion (36%) or mass (53%), most of them with spiculated contours. On MRI, 72% were visualized as masses and 18% corresponded to a non-mass-like enhancement. Size correlations, based on comparison with histology findings were: 0.88 (MRI, p<0.001), 0.57 (ultrasound), 0.53 (physical examination), and 0.40 (mammography). The Kappa correlations for multifocal/multicentric disease were: 0.87 (MRI), 0.22 (ultrasound), and 0.22 (mammography). MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 87%. The therapeutic strategy was modified in 49% of cases.

CONCLUSION

MRI is unquestionably valuable for the management of ILC. It provides the most accurate estimate of tumor size and is highly sensitive for multifocal/multicentric disease. Its main drawback is a lack of specificity that requires preoperative histologic verification. MRI often justifies modification of the initial therapeutic strategy, generally by ruling out a conservative procedure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Lobular carcinoma, breast neoplasm, magnetic resonance imaging

Cite This Abstract

Caramella, T, Chapellier, C, Ettore, F, Raoust, I, Chamorey, E, Catherine, M, Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Work-up of Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma: Prospective and Retrospective Study of 57 Cases—Comparison with Physical Examination, Conventional Imaging, and Histology.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5010731.html