RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSG04-08

Cost-effectiveness of New Cardiac and Vascular Rehabilitation Strategies for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 27, 2007
Presented as part of SSG04: Health Services, Policy, and Research (Economics)

Participants

Sandra Spronk MSc, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Johanna L. Bosch PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Connie Ryjewski, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Guido C. Kaandorp MSc, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
John V. White MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
M. G. Myriam Hunink MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Grant, W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc

PURPOSE

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently have peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which hinders their cardiac rehabilitation program because they are unable to achieve their target heart rate. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness from the societal perspective of new rehabilitation strategies which include the diagnosis and treatment of PAD in patients with CAD undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

We developed a Markov decision model to compare the following treatment strategies: 1. Cardiac rehabilitation; 2. Diagnostic work-up if cardiac rehabilitation fails followed by revascularization for PAD if needed; 3. Diagnostic work-up for PAD in all patients prior to cardiac rehabilitation and revascularization for PAD if needed; 4. A combined cardiovascular rehabilitation program. The best-available evidence was retrieved from the literature and combined with primary data from 231 patients. Quality-adjusted-life years (QALYs), life-time costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), and incremental net health benefits (iNHB) were calculated.

RESULTS

The cardiovascular rehabilitation was the most attractive with an ICER of $16,461 per QALY gained and an iNHB of 0.06 compared to current practice. In an analysis without this strategy, a diagnostic work-up if cardiac rehabilitation fails followed by revascularization for PAD if needed was most beneficial with an ICER of $49,468 per QALY gained and an iNHB of 0.02 compared to current practice.

CONCLUSION

A combined cardiovascular rehabilitation program, or a diagnostic work-up in patients who fail cardiac rehabilitation followed by revascularization for PAD if needed, could potentially decrease secondary cardiac events and save society millions of dollars.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Patients with coronary artery disease frequently have peripheral arterial disease, which hinders the cardiac rehabilitation program because patients are unable to achieve their target heart rate.

Cite This Abstract

Spronk, S, Bosch, J, Ryjewski, C, Kaandorp, G, White, J, Hunink, M, Cost-effectiveness of New Cardiac and Vascular Rehabilitation Strategies for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5010511.html