RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSK14-04

The Necessity of Using the Grid in Digital Mammography

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 28, 2007
Presented as part of SSK14: ISP: Physics (Diagnostic Radiography: Image Quality)

Participants

Mio Nagata, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Yuichi Nagai, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hitoshi Fukushima, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yoshiaki Shibata, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Chieko Nagashima, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Nachiko Uchiyama MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yukie Kobayashi, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Although it is common to use the “grid” in digital mammography,it can result in unnecessary radiation exposure for patients with small 1-2cm breasts due to increased doses. Is there an alternative to using a grid in this examination?

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The measurements and image-quality evaluations, listed below, were done with and without a grid and by using different types of grids and acrylic thicknesses (none to 5cm). 1.Physical Evaluation, a)Evaluation of a grid (measurement based on Japan standard). b)Change acrylic thickness and observe outcome of each combination for Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR). 2.Visual Evaluation-Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), Analysis-take mammography with and without a grid and change acrylic thickness. 3.Digital Image Processing - use image without a grid and 3-4cm acrylic thickness and change frequency processing to image using a grid.

RESULTS

1.Physical Evaluation a)Higher grid lines resulted in higher contrast, but also higher Bucky`s Factor. b)Increasing acrylic thickness produced higher CNR. 2.Visual Evaluation a)Thinner acrylic appeared to eliminate need for using a grid. 3.Digital Image Processing - using intense frequency causes higher contrast, but it was harder to find the simulation mass because of noise surrounding noise.

CONCLUSION

A clear image cannot be obtained by setting up a grid without exposing a patient to more than a fixed dose, but a clear image can be seen without using a grid if a patient has small breasts. Such a procedure can decrease the possibility of exposing a patient to unnecessary radiation although a grid should be used for patients eith larger breasts otherwise anti-scattering cannot be removed from the image. Use of a grid is necessary in digital mammography, therefore, but it is not needed for patients who have small 1-2cm breasts. In order to reduce patients being exposed to radiation, some kind of equipment is needed with a function that can remove or replace the need for a grid.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

These test results can be used for reducing patient exposure to radiation. Without information from the above experiment, equipment cannot be developed to increase image quality in the near future.

Cite This Abstract

Nagata, M, Nagai, Y, Fukushima, H, Shibata, Y, Nagashima, C, Uchiyama, N, Kobayashi, Y, et al, , et al, , The Necessity of Using the Grid in Digital Mammography.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5008792.html