RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSJ20-05

Normal and Edematous Bone Marrow: Insights from Kinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 27, 2007
Presented as part of SSJ20: Musculoskeletal (Bone Marrow Imaging)

Participants

Glenn A. Tung MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jon P. Dyle PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Deborah McK Ciombor, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Edward Jung MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alice M. Kim MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Roy K. Aaron, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Bone marrow edema (BME)can be associated with osteoarthritis (OA), avascular necrosis (AVN), and other causes. Its pathophysiology remains largely unknown. In this study, we compare perfusion kinetics of normal marrow and BME using dynamic, contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

DCE-MR imaging of the knee (n=15), hip (n=8), or ankle (n=2) was performed on 25 adults using a 1.5T magnet. VIBE sequence was performed before and during IV administration of 0.1mmol/kg of gadodiamide at 2cc/sec. Uniform ROIs were placed on BME and normal marrow to generate time-intensity curves. DCE-MRI images were analyzed with customized IDL 6.1 software. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using the Brix model to generate values for initial slope, amplitude parameter (A), and rate constants of gadodiamide transfer from interstitial space to plasma (kep), and elimination from plasma (kel). Student’s t- and nonparametric tests were used to compare kinetic parameters.

RESULTS

There were 17 women and 8 men; mean age, 55.2 yrs (range, 22-92); OA was present in 13; AVN, 9; nonspecific BME, 3. Compared to normal marrow, kinetic parameters of enhancement in areas of BME included higher initial slope [(BME, 95.2±50.1 (mean±st dev); normal marrow, 50.7±38.1; p<.001], higher A (0.99±0.42; 0.44±0.35; p<.001), lower kep (3.58±2.98; 5.40±4.44; p=.004), and lower kel (-0.037±0.036; 0.091±0.021; p<.001). In areas of BME around AVN, there was significantly lower A (AVN, 0.64±0.41; OA, 1.14±0.33; p=.009) and lower kel (-0.058±0.042; -0.023±0.034; p=.04) compared to BME adjacent to OA, but no significant difference in either initial slope (70.35±65.80; 111.79±46.87; p=.06) or kep (4.90±3.99; 3.20±2.63; p=.26).

CONCLUSION

DCE-MRI can be used to investigate enhancement kinetics in bone marrow and demonstrates relative increased perfusion and permeability but slow transfer of gadodiamide from the vascular space to areas of BME. Kinetic analysis of contrast-enhancement shows differences in BME associated AVN compared to osteoarthritis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

DCE-MRI shows differences in enhancement kinetics between normal and edematous bone marrow.

Cite This Abstract

Tung, G, Dyle, J, Ciombor, D, Jung, E, Kim, A, Aaron, R, Normal and Edematous Bone Marrow: Insights from Kinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5003886.html