RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSQ11-07

Automatic Computer Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) Studies of the Brain in Patients with Suspected Traumatic Brain Injury

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 29, 2007
Presented as part of SSQ11: ISP: Neuroradiology/Head and Neck (Brain: Trauma and Injury)

Participants

Esther Lim Yuh MD, PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Alisa D. Gean MD, Abstract Co-Author: Consultant, Advanced Quantum Sensors Consultant, Cambridge Neuroscience, Inc Speakers Bureau, Schering AG (Berlex Inc) Speakers Bureau, Bracco Group Speakers Bureau, General Electric Company
Geoffrey T. Manley MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Max Wintermark MD, Abstract Co-Author: Consultant, PAION AG

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of an automatic computer assessment of noncontrast CT studies of the brain obtained in patients with suspected traumatic brain injury, employing a board-certified neuroradiologist as the gold standard.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The noncontrast CT studies of the brain obtained in 33 consecutive patients with traumatic brain injury were retrospectively identified and independently reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist and by a computer algorithm for each of the following features: 1) presence or absence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2) presence or absence of clinically significant midline shift (≥ 5 mm), 3) normal, partly effaced, or completely effaced basal cisterns, and 4) presence or absence of a large (≥ 25 milliliters) intracranial hemorrhagic collection. Using the neuroradiologist interpretation as gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of the computer algorithm for each of the above-mentioned features were calculated.

RESULTS

Sensitivities and specificities of the computer algorithm were as follows: 1) sensitivity 100% and specificity 58.3% for presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2) sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 85% for clinically significant midline shift (≥ 5 mm), 3) sensitivity 93.8% and specificity 100% for effacement of basal cisterns, and 4) sensitivity 50% and specificity 90.3% for intracranial ≥ 25 milliliters hemorrhagic collections.

CONCLUSION

The tested automatic computer assessment of noncontrast CT studies of the brain accurately characterizes the typical features seen in case of traumatic brain injury.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Computer assessment of noncontrast CT studies of the brain might increase reproducibility and improve workflow in the setting of emergency neuroradiological evaluation of patients with suspected traum

Cite This Abstract

Yuh, E, Gean, A, Manley, G, Wintermark, M, Automatic Computer Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) Studies of the Brain in Patients with Suspected Traumatic Brain Injury.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5003459.html