RSNA 2006 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2006


LL-VI2018-D08

Stent Placement for Hemodialysis Access Stenosis of Resistance to Balloon Angioplasty: Comparison with Only Balloon Angioplasty

Scientific Posters

Presented on November 27, 2006
Presented as part of LLVI-D: Vascular/Interventional

Participants

Shuji Kariya MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Noboru Tanigawa MD,PHD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hiroyuki Kojima MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Atsushi Komemushi MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yuzo Shomura MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Tomokuni Shiraishi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Toshiaki Kawanaka MD,PHD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Satoshi Sawada MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of stent placement for hemodialysis access stenosis of resistance to balloon angioplasty by comparing with only balloon angioplasty.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Of 250 patients with 391 hemodialysis access stenoses performed percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, non-covered self-expandable stents were placed in 48 patients with 48 stenoses from August 2000 to January 2006. Stent placement followed balloon dilatation and was performed if the result of that balloon dilatation was considered low access flow for hemodialysis due to insufficient dilatation, or that balloon dilatation for the restenosis caused within three months after the last balloon angioplasty was able to obtain only the same vascular diameter as the previous that. An insufficient dilatation was defined as the residual stenosis of 50% or more, or as the stenosis due to vascular injury caused by balloon angioplasty. The patency rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and Logrank test.

RESULTS

Clinical success rate of stent placement was 95.8% (46 of 48). Residual percent diameter stenosis in 48 stenoses was 54.3±18.6% after only balloon angioplasty, and was 19.9±14.4% after stent placement. In 46 stenoses after stent placement, 6, 12, 24 and 36-month primary patency rates were 65.4%, 34.0%, 21.6% and 16.2%. In 46 patients after stent placements, 36-month secondary patency rates were 88.7%, however multiple repeat balloon angioplasty were required. In 46 stenoses, the primary patency rates were significantly lower than 329 stenoses performed only balloon angioplasty (p=0.012). Of 46 stenoses in 28 stenoses with the history of only balloon angioplasty for the same lesion in the past, the patency rates after stent placements were significantly higher than that after only balloon angioplasty (p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stent placement for stenosis of resistance to balloon angioplasty is effective for clinical success and patency rate, however the patency rate is lower than that of angioplasty that is not resistance to balloon dilatation, and multiple repeat balloon angioplasty were frequently required to maintain patency.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Stent placement for stenosis of resistance to balloon angioplasty is recommended.

Cite This Abstract

Kariya, S, Tanigawa, N, Kojima, H, Komemushi, A, Shomura, Y, Shiraishi, T, Kawanaka, T, Sawada, S, et al, , Stent Placement for Hemodialysis Access Stenosis of Resistance to Balloon Angioplasty: Comparison with Only Balloon Angioplasty.  Radiological Society of North America 2006 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 26 - December 1, 2006 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2006/4440798.html