RSNA 2005 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2005


SSM15-06

Hot Topic: Variability in Heating of an Elongated, Conductive Implant Across Two MR Systems

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2005
Presented as part of SSM15: Neuroradiology/Head and Neck (Cranial Nerves, Neurography)

Participants

Kenneth Baker PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Jean A. Tkach PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ali R. Rezai MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

Purpose:  To compare the MRI-related heating per unit of specific absorption rate (SAR) profile of a conductive implant between two 1.5-Tesla/64 MHz MR systems using a transmit/receive head coil configuration.  Importantly, the configuration and routing of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) system used during testing was consistent with current, FDA-approved guidelines concerning imaging of patients with DBS implants provided by the implant manufacturer. Materials and Methods: DBS leads were configured within a gel-filled phantom of the human head and torso.  Temperature variation at each of four contacts of the bilaterally-placed leads was monitored using fluoroptic thermometry.  MR imaging was performed using the t/r head coils of two different generation 1.5-Tesla MR systems from the same manufacturer.  Temperature changes were normalized to SAR values for the head (?T/SAR-H) and the slope of this ?T/SAR-H by time relationship was compared between the two scanners. Results:  The ?T/SAR-H for the implant was as much as 3.5 times higher across recording sites on one MR system as compared to the other (p <0.01).  Conclusion:  The present study reveals significant differences in the RF-induced heating profile of a DBS implant across two different MR systems from the same manufacturer, providing further evidence that SAR does not constitute a reliable index of heating for elongated, conductive implants such as the DBS hardware system tested.  Although similar differences between different MR systems have been reported previously using a body RF transmit configuration (8), the current results are particularly relevant in that the data were derived using a configuration of the MR system and the implant consistent with the FDA-approved MR safety guidelines provided by the implant manufacturer.  Based on the data presented, the upper limit of RF power provided in those guidelines could result in a ?T of 2.5°C over a period of two minutes on one of the two systems evaluated, a value 2.5 times higher than the spatially localized temperature limit for the head provided by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).

Cite This Abstract

Baker, K, Tkach, J, Rezai, A, Hot Topic: Variability in Heating of an Elongated, Conductive Implant Across Two MR Systems.  Radiological Society of North America 2005 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 27 - December 2, 2005 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2005/4425790.html