RSNA 2004 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2004


SSA16-06

Distinction between Nodules and False Positives in CAD Scheme for Lung Nodule Detection on Multidetector CT Images by Means of Massive Training Artificial Neural Networks

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 28, 2004
Presented as part of SSA16: Physics (Thoracic CAD)

Participants

Kenji Suzuki PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Qiang Li PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Feng Li MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Heber MacMahon MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Kunio Doi PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

A major problem in computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) schemes for lung nodule detection in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is a large number of false positives in order to maintain a high sensitivity. Our purpose was to develop a new technique for reduction of false positives in a CAD scheme using massive training artificial neural networks (MTANNs).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

To remove the false positives reported by our CAD scheme based on selective enhancement filters with linear discriminant analysis, we developed a multiple MTANN (multi-MTANN) consisting of eight MTANNs for reduction of eight different types of false positives. The MTANN was trained with input CT images and the corresponding teacher images. For distinction between nodules and non-nodules (false positives), the teacher images for nodules and non-nodules contained Gaussian distribution and zero, respectively. Each MTANN in the multi-MTANN was trained with ten typical nodules and ten non-nodules in each of eight different types. For example, MTANN 1 was trained to distinguish nodules from medium-sized vessels, MTANNs 2, 3, and 4 were designed to eliminate small vessels, vessels with high contrast, and some soft-tissue opacities. Eight MTANNs were combined with the logical AND operation such that eight different types of non-nodules can be eliminated. Our database contained 62 nodules in 32 MDCT scans acquired from 32 patients with an MDCT system. The MDCT scan consisted of an average of 186 thin-slice CT images (slice thickness was 1.25 or 2.5 mm). All nodules were confirmed by chest radiologists.

RESULTS

With our original CAD scheme, a sensitivity of 96.8% (60/62 nodules) together with 14.9 false positives per case was achieved. The multi-MTANN was applied to further reduction of false positives. Results indicated that 55.7% (265/476) of false positives were removed with a removal of one true positive. Thus, the false-positive rate of our CAD scheme was improved to 6.6 false positives per case at an overall sensitivity of 95.2% (59/62 nodules).

CONCLUSIONS

By use of a multi-MTANN, the specificity of our CAD scheme for lung nodule detection on MDCT images can be improved substantially, while a high sensitivity is maintained.

DISCLOSURE

K.D.,H.M.: K.D., H.M. are shareholders in R2 Technology, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, and K.D. is a shareholder in Deus Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD.

Cite This Abstract

Suzuki, K, Li, Q, Li, F, MacMahon, H, Doi, K, Distinction between Nodules and False Positives in CAD Scheme for Lung Nodule Detection on Multidetector CT Images by Means of Massive Training Artificial Neural Networks.  Radiological Society of North America 2004 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2004 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2004/4412096.html