RSNA 2004 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2004


SSQ19-01

PACS Archives: Comparison of Retrieval Time and Media Cost of Different Systems

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 2, 2004
Presented as part of SSQ19: Radiology Informatics (PACS: Cost, Security, and Ergonomics)

Participants

Stefan Wirth MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Marcus Treitl MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Klaus Juergen Pfeifer MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Comparison of retrieval times and media cost of different PACS archives for digital radiological image data.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Image retrieval times for radiological standard examinations (conventional chest X-ray with 2, MRI with 250, CT with 100 and 1000 images, n=120 each) from hard disk array, magneto-optical disk, and magnetic tape archives, were examined for a large PACS installation (Agfa Impax, Release 4.1) in situations specified by high and low network traffic load, respectively.

RESULTS

Even large CT scans (1000 images) were available from hard disk within 4.0 +/- 0.8s, smaller studies within 1.7 +/- 0.4 s. X-ray image retrieval from MOD (31 +/- 5 s) was 50% faster than from TAPE. For typical cross-sectional studies, the velocity gain amounted to 14%. There was no significant difference for large CT scans (650 +/-107s). For high and low network traffic load scenarios, image retrieval times from hard disk, MOD, and TAPE archives increased by 0%, 7%, and 22%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hard disk arrays are specifically suited as departmental intermediate storage media because they allow fast access to current and previous examinations within limited time. Performance properties enable both, MOD and TAPE systems to serve as long-term archives. MOD systems provide advantages for fast retrieval of X-ray or average-sized cross-sectional studies, and prove to be less sensitive to network traffic load variation, but on the other hand MOD media is most expensive by far. For definitive recommendations on PACS archive design, however, additional issues have to be taken into account, such as individual requirements of the imaging institution, installation costs, or the workspace required by the specific archiving solution.

Cite This Abstract

Wirth, S, Treitl, M, Pfeifer, K, Reiser, M, PACS Archives: Comparison of Retrieval Time and Media Cost of Different Systems.  Radiological Society of North America 2004 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2004 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2004/4403600.html