Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2003
K21-1048
Quantitative Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules: Impact of Scanning and Reconstruction Parameters on Accuracy and Reproducibility of Mean CT Density Measurements
Scientific Papers
Presented on December 3, 2003
Presented as part of K21: Physics (CT: Image Quality Dose)
Martin Huber PhD, PRESENTER: Nothing to Disclose
Abstract:
HTML
Purpose: The 3D based evaluation of spiral CT data using present
segmentation algorithms can provide more accurate diagnostic information, e.g.
volume and density measurements for pulmonary nodules, than common 2D
approaches. As CT enhancement techniques are potentially useful in
differentiating between benign and malignant lung nodules, a reliable
calculation of the mean CT density (in HU) is necessary. We thus investigated
the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative CT density measurements,
focusing upon the impact of scanning and reconstruction parameters on the
results.
Methods and Materials: Scans of a lung phantom, containing spheres with x-ray
absorption equivalent to soft tissue (~37 HU), were performed on a MSCT scanner
(Sensation 16, Siemens). The spheres ranged in diameter from 3mm to 10mm. To
simulate the lung parenchyma, the phantom was filled with shredded cork (~-1000
HU). A low dose protocol was used (120 kV, 16x0.75mm slice collimation, 1mm
slice width, 18mm feed/rot, 0.5s rotation time) with 10, 50 and 100 eff. mAs.
Reconstruction increments of 0.5mm and 0.8mm and soft and sharp reconstruction
kernels were applied. To reduce partial volume effects, an erosion operator was
applied to peel off the spheres an outer shell ranging between 0.5mm and 2.0mm;
the remaining voxels were used to calculate the mean CT density.
Results: The mean CT density was measured with very good reproducibility
(fluctuations were <5%). However systematic deviations from the expected
mean CT value (37 HU) were observed. The reconstruction kernels had the
strongest impact on the results, e.g. the mean density of a 7mm sphere ranged
between 6 HU for a soft kernel up to 68 HU for a sharp kernel. The discrepancy
between expected mean value and measured ones and the spread within
measurements was due to the modular transfer functions used for different
kernels. The mean CT density calculation was also affected by the erosion
parameter. The influence of the mAs settings on the density measurement was
higher (up to 30HU) for smaller spheres (<7mm) than for larger ones, whereas
the reconstruction increment had a negligible impact (< 4HU).
Conclusion: Reproducible mean CT density measurements for small pulmonary
nodules were obtained using a threshold and morphological filtering based
segmentation algorithm. The results were influenced by the scanning and
reconstruction settings. To compare mean CT density measurements from different
CT examinations (e.g. follow-up studies), it is thus necessary to always use
the same scan protocol and reconstruction parameters. (M.H., M.M., D.R., G.K.,
T.S. are employees of Siemens AG.)
Questions about this event email: martin.huber@siemens.com
Huber PhD, M,
Quantitative Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules: Impact of Scanning and Reconstruction Parameters on Accuracy and Reproducibility of Mean CT Density Measurements. Radiological Society of North America 2003 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 30 - December 5, 2003 ,Chicago IL.
http://archive.rsna.org/2003/3104610.html