RSNA 2016

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2016


SSQ06-02

Body Composition Profiling using MRI - Normative Data for Subjects with Diabetes Extracted from the UK Biobank Imaging Cohort

Thursday, Dec. 1 10:40AM - 10:50AM Room: E350



FDA Discussions may include off-label uses.

Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard, PhD, Linkoping, Sweden (Presenter) Stockholder, AMRA AB; Employee, AMRA AB
Jennifer Linge, Linkoping, Sweden (Abstract Co-Author) Employee, AMRA AB
Janne West, MSc, PhD, Linkoping, Sweden (Abstract Co-Author) Employee, AMRA AB; Stockholder, AMRA AB
Jimmy D. Bell, PhD, London, United Kingdom (Abstract Co-Author) Nothing to Disclose
Magnus Borga, PhD, Linkoping, Sweden (Abstract Co-Author) Stockholder, AMRA AB
PURPOSE

To describe the distribution of MRI derived body composition measurements in subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) compared to subjects without diabetes.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

3900 subjects (1864 males and 2036 females) from the UK Biobank imaging study were included in the study. The age range was 45 to 78 years. Visceral adipose tissue volume normalized with height^2 (VATi), total abdominal adipose tissue volume normalized with height^2 (ATATi), total lean thigh muscle volume normalized with body weight (muscle ratio) and liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) were measured with a 6 minutes 2-point Dixon imaging protocol covering neck to knee and a 10-point Dixon single axial slice protocol positioned within the liver using a 1.5T MR-scanner (Siemens, Germany). The MR-images were analyzed using AMRA® Profiler research (AMRA, Sweden). 194 subjects with clinically diagnosed DM (DM group) were age and gender matched to subjects without DM (control group). For each variable and group, the median, 25%-percentile and 75%-percentile was calculated. Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the observed differences.

RESULTS

VATi in the DM group was 2.13 (1.43-2.62) l/m^2 (median, 25% - 75% percentile) compared to 1.32 (0.86 - 1.79) l/m^2 in the control group. ATATi in the DM group was 4.94 (3.86-6.19) l/m^2 compared to 3.40 (2.56 - 4.70) l/m^2 in the control group. Muscle ratio in the DM group was 0.13 (0.11 - 0.14) l/kg compared to 0.14 (0.12 - 0.15) l/kg in the control group. Liver PDFF in the DM group was 7.23 (2.68 - 13.26) % compared to 2.49 (1.53 - 4.73) % in the control group. Mann-Whitney U test detected significant differences between the DM group and the control group for all variables (p<10-5).

CONCLUSION

DM is strongly associated with high visceral fat, liver fat, and total abdominal fat, and low muscle ratio.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Body composition profiling shows high potential to provide direct biomarkers to improve characterization and early diagnosis of DM.