RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


SSE09-04

Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Using Sliding Slab Raysum Interpretation: Low-dose Unenhanced CT vs Standard-dose Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2009
Presented as part of SSE09: Gastrointestinal (Appendicitis)

Participants

Kyoung Ho Lee MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Hyo Bin Seo, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hyuk Jung Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
So Yeon Kim MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Young Hoon Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To compare low-dose unenhanced CT with standard-dose intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

207 adults with suspected appendicitis underwent both scans with mean effective dose of 4.2 and 8.0 mSv, respectively. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed thin-section images, by sliding a 5-mm-thick raysum slab. They rated the likelihood of appendicitis and appendiceal visualization using 5- and 3-point scales, respectively, and proposed alternative diagnoses. Likelihood ≥ 3 was considered as a positive diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic analyses, McNemar tests, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were used.

RESULTS

78 patients had appendicitis. The Az values of the two scans were 0.98 vs. 0.97 (95% CI for the difference, -0.02, 0.03) and 0.99 vs. 0.98 (-0.02, 0.02) for each reader, respectively. The sensitivity was 98.7% vs. 100% (p = 1.00) and 100% vs. 100%. The specificity was 95.3% vs. 93.0% (p = 0.25) and 96.9% vs. 96.9%. The interpretation was indeterminate (score 3) in 0.5% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.63) and 0.5% vs. 0% (p = 1.00). The normal appendix was not visualized in 5.4% vs. 3.9%, (p = 0.63) and 3.9% vs. 2.3% (p = 0.50). None of the patients whose appendix was not visualized had appendicitis. Diagnostic confidence, visualization score for the normal appendix, and correct alternative diagnosis tended to be compromised in the low-dose unenhanced scan, showing significant difference for a reader’s confidence in diagnosing appendicitis (p = 0.004). The two scans were comparable for the diagnosis of appendiceal perforation.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose unenhanced CT is potentially useful in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Low-dose unenhanced CT can be recommended for the initial evaluation of adults suspected of having appendicitis.

Cite This Abstract

Lee, K, Seo, H, Kim, H, Kim, S, Kim, Y, Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Using Sliding Slab Raysum Interpretation: Low-dose Unenhanced CT vs Standard-dose Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8004265.html