RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


SSE09-06

Detection of the Normal Appendix with Low-dose Unenhanced CT: Use of the Sliding Slab Averaging Technique

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2009
Presented as part of SSE09: Gastrointestinal (Appendicitis)

Participants

Kyoung Ho Lee MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Seung Moon Joo MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Young Hoon Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
So Yeon Kim MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Bohyoung Kim PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency of normal appendix visualization at low-dose (LD) unenhanced computed tomography (CT) performed with a 16– or 64–detector row scanner when images are reviewed by using the sliding slab averaging technique.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The institutional review board approved the study and waived the informed consent requirement. A total of 259 patients, 37 (14.3%) of whom had previously undergone appendectomy, underwent LD unenhanced CT (mean effective dose, 1.7 mSv) performed with a 16– or 64–detector row scanner to assess urinary colic. Three readers used the sliding slab averaging technique to retrospectively review the thin-section (0.67- or 2.00-mm section thickness) images and grade the appendix as absent, unsurely or partly visualized, or clearly and entirely visualized. Interobserver agreement was measured with weighted Κ statistics. McNemar tests were used to compare sensitivity between the readers. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effects of body mass index, patient sex, and type of CT scanner on appendiceal visualization.

RESULTS

The Κ statistics for each reader pair were as follows: 0.97 for agreement between readers 1 and 2, 0.93 for agreement between readers 2 and 3, and 0.92 for agreement between readers 1 and 3. Each reader clearly identified the entire appendix in 213 (96.0%), 209 (94.1%), and 205 (92.3%) of the 222 patients without a history of appendectomy. When unsurely or partly visualized appendices were included, the frequencies increased to 99.1% (n = 220), 98.7% (n = 219), and 97.3% (n = 216), respectively, for readers 1, 2, and 3. These frequencies rarely differed between the readers. (P values ranged from .021 to greater than .99.) The three readers consistently reported that the appendix was not visualized in the 37 patients who had undergone appendectomy. None of the tested variables significantly affected appendix visualization.

CONCLUSION

Most normal appendices are visualized on thin-section LD unenhanced CT images reviewed with the sliding slab averaging technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

LD unenhanced CT has the potential to serve as the first-line imaging test in the exclusion of appendicitis, as it has a lower radiation dose and is faster and less expensive than other modalities.

Cite This Abstract

Lee, K, Joo, S, Kim, Y, Kim, S, Kim, B, Detection of the Normal Appendix with Low-dose Unenhanced CT: Use of the Sliding Slab Averaging Technique.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8004263.html