RSNA 2003 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2003


C18-376

Prevalence-modified Estimation of Computer-determined Probabilities of Malignancy for CAD

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2003
Presented as part of C18: Physics (Image Processing: CAD I--Breast)

Participants

Karla Horsch PhD, PRESENTER: Nothing to Disclose

Abstract: HTML Purpose: To assess the benefit of prevalence modification to the performance of radiologists using multi-modality intelligent workstations for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Methods and Materials: Our current multi-modality intelligent workstation utilizes two estimates of a lesion's probability of malignancy (PM): one obtained from a classifier trained on a sonographic database of 356 cases (cancer prevalence=0.19) and an another from a classifier trained on a mammographic database of 267 cases (cancer prevalence=0.55). These estimates of the PM are dependent on the prevalence of cancer in each training database, which usually does not correspond to the prevalence best suited to the user, for example, the prevalence of the population seen in the user's medical practice. We use an estimate of the prevalence best suited to the user to transform the computer-estimated PM into a prevalence-modified estimate of the PM by an application of Bayes' rule. An estimate of the prevalence best suited to the user is determined by relating the radiologist's PM to that of the computer-estimated PM for a given set of breast lesions. Results: A radiologist gave a PM for each case in a mammographic and sonographic database (97 lesions in each case) and these values of the PM were used to estimate the radiologist's operating prevalence by determining the least squares fit to a Bayes' rule transformation of the computer-estimated PM. The radiologist's operating prevalence for the mammographic database was 0.46 and for the sonographic database was 0.51. Before prevalence modification, the correlation between the radiologist PM and the computer PM was 0.48 and 0.47 for the mammographic and sonographic databases, respectively. After prevalence modification, the correlation was 0.73 and 0.75 for the mammographic and sonographic databases, respectively. Conclusion: Our preliminary study indicates that prevalence modification increases the correlation between the radiologist-estimated probabilities of malignancy and the computer-estimated probabilities of malignancy. It is expected that intelligent workstations that use prevalence-modified probabilities of malignancy will improve the performance of radiologists in the task of differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions. (M.L.G., C.J.V., C.M., G.N.,  and R.A.S. are shareholders in R2 Technology, Inc.)

Cite This Abstract

Horsch PhD, K, Prevalence-modified Estimation of Computer-determined Probabilities of Malignancy for CAD.  Radiological Society of North America 2003 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 30 - December 5, 2003 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2003/3107305.html